| 1 |
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 04:05:00 -0600 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hola all, |
| 5 |
> Just a nudge since we've discussed this before, but likely upcoming |
| 6 |
> changes to emerge-webrsync got me thinking it's probably worthwhile |
| 7 |
> having a look at what can be chunked out from mainline portage as a |
| 8 |
> seperate release. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Right now, emerge-webrsync is an easy target; repoman... not so much |
| 11 |
> so, but could be done. Others? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well, I'm not so much for ripping every little 5liner out of portage and |
| 14 |
put it into its own package. emerge-webrsync is such a thing I'd rather |
| 15 |
keep inline (should be subject for integration into emerge --sync |
| 16 |
instead), same with etc-update for example. Yes, it might be a bit |
| 17 |
annoying having to wait for a portage release to push a small change |
| 18 |
out, OTOH it will make things a lot more confusing for ordinary users |
| 19 |
IMO. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Marius |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 27 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives