From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: proj/portage:master commit in: man/, pym/portage/dbapi/, pym/portage/, cnf/ | ||
Date: | Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:10:15 | ||
Message-Id: | 20121025123212.GE85698@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: proj/portage:master commit in: man/, pym/portage/dbapi/, pym/portage/, cnf/ by Zac Medico |
1 | On 25-10-2012 02:45:41 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 | > > can't you use os.fdatasync() or os.fsync() instead? |
3 | > |
4 | > os.fdatasync() or os.fsync() only work for single files, right? We don't |
5 | > want to sync them individually, since that wastes disk bandwidth. It's |
6 | > much more efficient to sync the whole filesystem at once, like syncfs does. |
7 | |
8 | You use syncfs, which according to the man-page requires a |
9 | filedescriptor. Hence my suggestion. |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Fabian Groffen |
14 | Gentoo on a different level |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: proj/portage:master commit in: man/, pym/portage/dbapi/, pym/portage/, cnf/ | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |