Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] depgraph._resolve: consider unresolved @system atoms fatal (bug 568354)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:13:30
Message-Id: 56719BAE.7010401@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] depgraph._resolve: consider unresolved @system atoms fatal (bug 568354) by Alexander Berntsen
1 On 12/16/2015 05:35 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
2 > On 16/12/15 04:31, Zac Medico wrote:
3 >> On 12/15/2015 12:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
4 >>> Since @system atoms are presumably chosen by someone who knows what
5 >>> they are doing (usually a gentoo developer), it makes sense to consider
6 >>> resolution failures for these atoms as fatal errors.
7 >>>
8 >>> X-Gentoo-Bug: 568354
9 >>> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568354
10 >
11 >> Hmm, maybe this should suggest config changes, which could even be
12 >> written with --autounmask-write. That would be much friendlier.
13 > I have nothing against the original patch regardless.
14
15 Thanks, pushed.
16
17 I'll leave autounmask support unimplemented for now, since it probably
18 would not get much use.
19 --
20 Thanks,
21 Zac