1 |
On 12/16/2015 05:35 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
2 |
> On 16/12/15 04:31, Zac Medico wrote: |
3 |
>> On 12/15/2015 12:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
4 |
>>> Since @system atoms are presumably chosen by someone who knows what |
5 |
>>> they are doing (usually a gentoo developer), it makes sense to consider |
6 |
>>> resolution failures for these atoms as fatal errors. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> X-Gentoo-Bug: 568354 |
9 |
>>> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568354 |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> Hmm, maybe this should suggest config changes, which could even be |
12 |
>> written with --autounmask-write. That would be much friendlier. |
13 |
> I have nothing against the original patch regardless. |
14 |
|
15 |
Thanks, pushed. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'll leave autounmask support unimplemented for now, since it probably |
18 |
would not get much use. |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Thanks, |
21 |
Zac |