Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dblink: add locks for parallel-install with blockers (bug 576888)
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:26:36
Message-Id: 56E691CF.5000006@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dblink: add locks for parallel-install with blockers (bug 576888) by Zac Medico
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But
5 please test this *a lot* before merging it.
6
7 Regarding the merging of this patch, and th egencache patch that has
8 already been released: I thought we agreed that .29 should be *only*
9 the repoman merger, and then bug fixes go into a .30 where we try to
10 get a stable release with the new repoman. Why was egencache merged
11 anyway? Should we not merge repoman to stable ASAP before doing
12 anything else? That would make .29 easier.
13 - --
14 Alexander
15 bernalex@g.o
16 https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v2
19
20 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW5pHOAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BE0QQAMep2RpCTpTaW8N3D0iwxmY4
21 nOJPtvN+BZzWWFW+j0CIkwn3uinuN/NuxOOvnW7ZMwATHsmToPpt1VCsfXcelzTv
22 atx/1dPkdWCeeEDFEYpECInV+Lj38Sf1tlDIaWRmmDuHUkf71LojUlpvptFgEW7M
23 TCs7bnxyqQXxIDl+QGxWvFC3vWG14c59mMG2bPV+gKYpf010tc4tGRKPxKtT8Pu/
24 0JD/cq0KBdFqCh/lPZ6XruayzTQoEd3hYRn/3MPKdT/EyKhtwfGFs785gMDjNSpc
25 BPWCYH18Ff/s20Rldn2120QiDzK45D/ty/y4tS+rZoIcxzRycr+ZoxwrvNFX/mC4
26 PZEUw32Cw/vilJv1d0qAuk5oxXYMGVCzmhGSwbv/pap4ECjgjHaMhAoGHRvk0086
27 q2uJTq6hjsmpxSUhRkEvSqbdaTGLyGI5HZLjaWJjg7mbj6TAcbecJhOITzYzVIat
28 ILjfAV3o/kCNSDptLa9Zxf46jdjvZWc+22+l3R8Ci8S5y9WT/x38Hj2CbLSD9Lqe
29 jAQvamt5oucQ7rZ7L3ypQPURxrjNY/AhivYzroYlFYoAsp6J7Ni0FOMMUvh0mBVv
30 n49HUz7Hh/FEFlmYCA5vyBArSlB+VBzGdMbyc5xPjsKbwGHq24OgJRqWLFC84DiY
31 jnXERLU0GnopPhth/xhs
32 =wGXd
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies