Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>, gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Update /usr/portage references (bug 378603)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 22:39:34
Message-Id: 5f38d7cc-8607-a996-ddcf-bcd461beb91a@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Update /usr/portage references (bug 378603) by "M. J. Everitt"
1 On 08/06/2018 02:50 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
2 > On 06/08/18 19:35, Zac Medico wrote:
3 >> On 08/06/2018 12:30 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
4 >>> All these changes as well as the catlayst changes need to be
5 >>> co-ordinated so that snapshots and portage and stages don't precede the
6 >>> docs changes.
7 >> I suppose all of the docs changes can be made in advance, with mention
8 >> of both old a new locations. These commands can be used to check the
9 >> local configuration:
10 >>
11 >> portageq get_repo_path / gentoo
12 >> portageq distdir
13 >> portageq pkgdir
14 > Sounds like a plan .. do we need a tracker bug?! :P
15 >
16 > Let's do this! :D
17
18 Ok, tracker created:
19
20 https://bugs.gentoo.org/662982
21 --
22 Thanks,
23 Zac

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature