Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] install_qa_check() for hppa64 and ia64-hpux

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thursday 16 July 2009 04:15:50 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 July 2009 04:40:14 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > > have noticed that the "Evaluating misc gcc warnings" QA check does not
> > > know about "hppa64" cpu in bin/misc-functions.sh:
> > > alpha*|hppa64*|ia64*|powerpc64*|mips64*|sparc64*|sparcv9*|x86_64*)
> > > gentoo_bug=yes ;; esac
> >
> > looks fine to me -- feel free to add it.  or if you cant, i can throw it
> > in if people dont beat me to it.
>
> Should be possible for me, thank you!

ive added to svn, thanks

> > > As we do not do multilib in Prefix, "ia64-hp-hpux*" is 32bit, and I
> > > want to hear your thoughts about this additional line there:
> > >             case ${CHOST} in
> > >         +      ia64-hp-hpux*) ;; # multilib with 32bit default, 64bit
> > > is ia64w-hp-hpux*
> > > alpha*|hppa64*|ia64*|powerpc64*|mips64*|sparc64*|sparcv9*|x86_64*)
> > > gentoo_bug=yes ;; esac
> >
> > the check is to catch the majority of users, and it does.  i dont want to
> > go down this rabbit hole.  about we just fix the source code in question
> > and call it a day.
>
> AFAICS, it is the only exception to "*64*" being 64bit.
> But ok, seems I'll have to mask gcc-4.3 even for hppa-hpux anyway.

the fix here though seems like it should be relatively straight forward ?  
just add a missing #include or #define ?  or are there more gcc-4.3 problems 
than this for that target ?
-mike