From: | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch) | ||
Date: | Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:38:16 | ||
Message-Id: | 4407594A.8060309@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch) by Brian Harring |
1 | Brian Harring wrote: |
2 | > On 2/28/06, *Michael Schilling* <gentoo@×××××××.de |
3 | > <mailto:gentoo@×××××××.de>> wrote: |
4 | > |
5 | > - Is one of these svn-web-repository up to date? |
6 | > * http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/branches/savior/ |
7 | > * http://mzz.mine.nu/bzr/savior-svn/portage/ |
8 | > <http://mzz.mine.nu/bzr/savior-svn/portage/> |
9 | > |
10 | > |
11 | > I switched over to bzr about 2 months back; svn doesn't allow for |
12 | > offline committing, nor does gentoo's vcs allow for anon*... bzr |
13 | > natively allows for those capabilities, so that's what I'm using. :) |
14 | > |
15 | > http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour |
16 | > Is where I'll be updating the code for at least the near future. |
17 | > |
18 | |
19 | Does that mean we should drop the SVN branch? |
20 | |
21 | Marius |
22 | |
23 | -- |
24 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch) | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch) | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |