1 |
Hi once again |
2 |
|
3 |
From all the responses ;) just wondering if this feature is being |
4 |
developed and/or supported. Should I put time into extending the portage |
5 |
code on this or is it being dropped? I do have a need for this feature |
6 |
and need to make a decision as to where to spend my time and efforts |
7 |
(maybe rpm building in a separate project?). |
8 |
I would like know if the portage maintainers would be interested in |
9 |
patches. |
10 |
|
11 |
PS. |
12 |
I do apologize if this sounds pushy or rude, it's not intended to be ;) |
13 |
|
14 |
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 12:31, Ron Wills wrote: |
15 |
> Hi all |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I've noticed the rpm packaging support is a little broken in the |
18 |
> current version of portage. Currently it tries to build packages with |
19 |
> rpm -bb and with the newer versions of rpm it should be rpmbuild -bb. I |
20 |
> have a patch to fixes this (first searches for rpmbuild and then uses |
21 |
> rpm if it can't find it). |
22 |
> Also looking into it, I've cleaned up the dynamic spec a bit and added |
23 |
> several features (ei. provides tag, post env-update || ldconfig, and so |
24 |
> on). I thought before I sent any patches, I just thought I'd inquire |
25 |
> about the status of this feature. I've noticed there seems to be two |
26 |
> streams for this project at the moment (the current portage and |
27 |
> portage-ng). |
28 |
> I have great use for this feature and willing to implement it as fully |
29 |
> as I can (time permitting :P), if your interested. I just need to know |
30 |
> where to send the patches, for your review ;) |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Ron Wills <ron@××××××.ca> |
34 |
RW Software |