| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Google SoC and "cache sync" |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:41:50 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Recommendation about faster (not smaller) filesystem and blocksize combination for portage tree |
Duncan |
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:31:04 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Google SoC and "cache sync" |
Emma Strubell |
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:01:59 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Recommendation about faster (not smaller) filesystem and blocksize combination for portage tree |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:30:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] version management for eclasses |
Amit Dor-Shifer |
Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:34:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] version management for eclasses |
Zac Medico |
Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:19:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] version management for eclasses |
Amit Dor-Shifer |
Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:12:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Markus Duft |
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:36:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Ned Ludd |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:08:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] version management for eclasses |
Zac Medico |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:46:40 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] version management for eclasses |
Amit Dor-Shifer |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:12:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Michael Haubenwallner |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:28:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Markus Duft |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:28:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Ned Ludd |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:44:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Markus Duft |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:57:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Fabian Groffen |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:00:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Markus Duft |
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:01:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Markus Duft |
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:28:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Markus Duft |
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:31:06 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining |
Markus Duft |
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:37:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:50:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:27:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:00:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:45:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Ned Ludd |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:49:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:06:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Ned Ludd |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:35:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:49:14 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen |
Amit Dor-Shifer |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:34:31 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: %n in writable segment detected ?? |
Duncan |
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:52:38 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: %n in writable segment detected ?? |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] %n in writable segment detected ?? |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:58:41 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: %n in writable segment detected ?? |
Duncan |
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:33 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] %n in writable segment detected ?? |
Duncan |
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:54:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Who's maintaining the "Eclass HOWTO" page nowdays? |
Alec Warner |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:05:49 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Who's maintaining the "Eclass HOWTO" page nowdays? |
Amit Dor-Shifer |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:15:43 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] PyCon 2009 Sprint? |
gravydish@×××××.com |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:21:49 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Deprecate portage.abssymlink |
Douglas Anderson |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:38:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] What is a "meta package"? |
Douglas Anderson |
Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:48:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] What is a "meta package"? |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) |
Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:44:09 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] What is a "meta package"? |
Amit Dor-Shifer |
Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:36:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:55:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed |
Zac Medico |
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:21:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:55:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:01:24 |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:20:50 |
Archives