| 1 |
Hi Stephan, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
* Stephan van Maris <svmaris@×××××××××.nl> [03/03/25 11:07 +0100]: |
| 4 |
>Shouldn't the current x86 keyword be taken into consideration? I mean, can a |
| 5 |
>ppc ebuild be 'stable' when it's still unstable on x86 (apart from the stuff |
| 6 |
>wich is -x86 of course, like xeasyconf and pmud)? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yes it could. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
There are a lot of ebuilds, which are marked x86 but ~ppc, |
| 11 |
and some that are ~x86 but ppc (e.g. XFree-4.3.0 as the |
| 12 |
most important one). If you go through the ebuilds you will |
| 13 |
also find some, that are marked stable on other |
| 14 |
architectures (like sparc) but not for x86. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Latest is to say, that there are also some ebuilds where |
| 17 |
other people decide, when it should be stable (like the |
| 18 |
baselayout or portage). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, Lars |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives