Gentoo Archives: gentoo-ppc-dev

From: John Steele Scott <toojays@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-ppc-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-ppc-dev] which glibc is supposed to be ppc stable atm?
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:45:27
Message-Id: 200406121212.49434.toojays@toojays.net
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 About a week ago, Pieter set glibc-2.3.3_pre20040420-r1 to be ppc stable, but
5 it seems that since then that ebuild has been removed from portage, so my
6 system wants me to downgrade to glibc-2.3.3_pre20040420.
7
8 This looks like a mistake to me, i.e. glibc-2.3.3_pre20040420-r1.ebuild should
9 be put back into portage. Is this correct?
10
11 cheers,
12
13 John
14 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
15 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
16 Comment: Messages with missing or bad signatures may have been forged or modified in transit!
17
18 iD8DBQFAym2m0BW7kPcXjRURAh1LAKDlP/EJTHG3MxgFvx1usHqnBw/phQCbB2K6
19 EbqtAH/98ls7lEHKnue7PoU=
20 =49n6
21 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
22
23 --
24 gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list