1 |
Well, as I have said in IRC, I believe that creating a new rsync tree |
2 |
would fix things for the moment. We could always have a testing tree for |
3 |
those who want to use err test, err blow up their systems with the |
4 |
latest packages. |
5 |
|
6 |
Debian does it this way, keeping all the different archs seperate. With |
7 |
a binary packaging method it has to be done this way so why isnt this |
8 |
done when the packages are in source form? This would solve little |
9 |
problems such as xforms and we could also fix other little things which |
10 |
say they require nasm but don't really need it. |
11 |
|
12 |
In the future it would be great if portage could do this automagically. |
13 |
It could look at the arch and then pull from the correct tree. |
14 |
|
15 |
Owen |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Owen Stampflee - owen@××××××××××.org |
19 |
http://penguinppc.org/~owen |