Gentoo Archives: gentoo-ppc-dev

From: Pieter Van den Abeele <pvdabeel@g.o>
To: John Steele Scott <toojays@×××××××.net>
Cc: Pieter Van den Abeele <pvdabeel@g.o>, gentoo-ppc-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] what's the story with KDE at the moment?
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:15:48
In Reply to: [gentoo-ppc-dev] what's the story with KDE at the moment? by John Steele Scott
Both issues are fixed in cvs. Sorry for not being able to take care of 
this faster; we were at apple expo Paris.

Best regards,

Pieter Van den Abeele

On 02 Sep 2004, at 12:53, John Steele Scott wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > KDE 3.3.0 has been marked stable on ppc at the moment, but at least one > dependency has not <> and > kdeedu > doesn't compile <>. There > is some > ill feeling about this issue on the gentoo-dev list. > > As someone who is not a Gentoo dev, I have two questions: > > 1) Is there going to be a concerted push to stabilise KDE 3.3.0 on > ppc, i.e. > within the next week, or will stable ppc be downgraded to KDE 3.2.3? > > 2) It looks like the problem is not that the bugs haven't been > reported, but > that the devs haven't had time to deal with them. Is there anything > regular > users can do to help ppc-devs out with this issue? > > cheers, > > John > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Messages with missing or bad signatures may have been forged > or modified in transit! > > iD8DBQFBNvuR0BW7kPcXjRURAhVsAJ91uzM0ZUJS6MMfK6Wz1zehul4WoQCgqlk5 > w/WlNbMzJZ8xHSVErzjDKbQ= > =SNb7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list >
-- gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] what's the story with KDE at the moment? John Steele Scott <toojays@×××××××.net>