1 |
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:34, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 08:56, Ethan wrote: |
3 |
> > Sorry if this has been posted before. |
4 |
> > I've found that the gcc-2.95.3 used in the latest PPC build has the |
5 |
> > atexit() problem with static executables (for example, when you build |
6 |
> > fileutils-4.1 with LDFLAGS=-static all execuatbles dump a core). |
7 |
> > If I remember correctly, patches here are required: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2001-03/msg00140.html |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg01187.html |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Is this a new issue that you've experienced after upgrading? Or has |
14 |
> this always been the case? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Please give me more information on the specific problems you have and |
17 |
> have not experienced. For example, I'm assuming you're having problems |
18 |
> with gcc-2.95.3-r7? Did you have problems with any earlier revision of |
19 |
> our gcc ebuilds? |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
This should have been an issue with all versions before -r7. If you |
23 |
dont have -r7, upgrade, and then remerge glibc. |
24 |
|
25 |
I have updated the Changelog, and the ebuild as well with the correct |
26 |
bugzilla #'s, and the Changelog now also contain the URL's to the |
27 |
patches. Our gcc was patched with the first version of the atexit() |
28 |
patch, which if I recall stopped working for glibc-2.2.4. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
|
33 |
Martin Schlemmer |
34 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer |
35 |
Cape Town, South Africa |