Gentoo Archives: gentoo-ppc-dev

From: "David Holm <dholm@g.o>" <dholm@g.o>
To: gentoo-ppc-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] working ebuilds in app-emacs
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:02:24
Message-Id: 200403141405.19384.dholm@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] working ebuilds in app-emacs by John Steele Scott
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi,
5 if you have tested packages on ~ppc and know that they work please go ahead
6 and submit a list to the mailing list. I try to test and bump packages daily
7 and it would help if people indicate which packages they want/have tested.
8
9 //David Holm
10
11 On Sunday 14 March 2004 04.26, John Steele Scott wrote:
12 > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:31, Carsten Milling wrote:
13 > > There are quite a few more packages in app-emacs that don't have a ppc
14 > > keyword which are all emacs lisp and should be pretty much
15 > > architecture independent. Would it be a big deal to at least add them
16 > > to ~ppc?
17 >
18 > Hi Carsten,
19 >
20 > I opened bug 43331 to ask a similar question a couple of weeks ago. The
21 > reply was that an ebuild won't get a ~ppc until it has at least been tested
22 > by one person on that ppc.
23 >
24 > cheers,
25 >
26 > John
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
29
30 iD8DBQFAVFiNxVDe1wIoqX0RArrnAJ0ViDZiOhZdmhXDGpBozpFIe6O0OgCgl/Ba
31 Ke9Zu+NssKpQ8uwTyMYmT+g=
32 =/sp/
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
34
35 --
36 gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list