| 1 |
glibc is not backwards compatible... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I had a copy of a binary glibc that someone made for me, but I dont' have it |
| 4 |
anymore :( But that is my suggestion, get someone to make a binary, and |
| 5 |
have them send it to you... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
there may be another way, but I don't know... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Gene |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 12 |
From: <mutex@×××××××.org> |
| 13 |
To: <gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o> |
| 14 |
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 1:03 AM |
| 15 |
Subject: [gentoo-ppc-dev] latest GLIBC borks things beyond belief |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> so, I have been on irc today complaining about how the latest glibc has |
| 19 |
> borked my entire system, but I figure maybe people will have more ideas |
| 20 |
> if I post to the mailing list... |
| 21 |
> at any rate! |
| 22 |
> after an emerge sync today, i emerged |
| 23 |
> binutils-2.13.90.0.16 and unmerged binutils-2.14.90.0.1-r1 |
| 24 |
> (this must be a portage bug) |
| 25 |
> and emerged |
| 26 |
> glibc-2.3.1-r2 and unmerged glibc-2.3.2-r1 |
| 27 |
> and now my system is totally borked, not a single program seems to be |
| 28 |
> able to use /lib/libpthread.so.0, and that is the only problem I have |
| 29 |
> been able to really diagnose, but it looks like execvp is failing. |
| 30 |
> so.. any ideas would be helpful, am I a freak accident or did I find a |
| 31 |
> bug in portage ? |
| 32 |
> Dave |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives