1 |
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:57:36 -0700, Mike S wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> well I checked the /etc/make.conf file, and yes you were right |
4 |
> (almost) I am not sure what the difference is, but I am sure that I |
5 |
> will find out sooner or later, instead of CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK variable |
6 |
> set to something I had CONFIG_PROTECT="-*". So for the time being I |
7 |
> just commented that line out, and will maybe change it once I learn |
8 |
> more about it. |
9 |
|
10 |
A wise move. It is not a good idea to add settings you don't fully |
11 |
understand to a system-critical config file :( |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> I will investigate the difference between CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK and |
15 |
> CONFIG_PROTECT and see what the difference is (if any), or if they are |
16 |
> merely the same variable with different names, |
17 |
|
18 |
In fact, they are complete opposites of each other. See man make.conf for |
19 |
more details. |
20 |
|
21 |
CONFIG_PROTECT = [space delimited list of dirs] |
22 |
All directories that are defined here will have "config file |
23 |
protection" enabled for them. For more information, please see |
24 |
`emerge --help config`. |
25 |
|
26 |
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK = [space delimited list of dirs] All directories that |
27 |
are defined here will have "config file protection" disabled for |
28 |
them. For more information, please see `emerge --help config`. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Neil Bothwick |
33 |
|
34 |
Me? FAT? No, just horizontally disproportionate... |