| 1 |
On Thursday 07 June 2007 23:38, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 2 |
> The following document is part of a mail I've sent to the proctors@ |
| 3 |
> alias 6 weeks ago and that was my contribution to a discussion we were |
| 4 |
> having about the CoC and the proctors. |
| 5 |
Thanks for sharing the info. It's nice to see some transparency (although Mr |
| 6 |
Marples' attempts to be transparent shows the difficulty.) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> At the time I didn't submit that document here, because there was no |
| 9 |
> such ml and we were still having an initial internal discussion. |
| 10 |
Understood and perfectly reasonable. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Since the team has yet to publish any document on this due to a variety |
| 13 |
> of reasons and that we've been accused of not working on this issue (I |
| 14 |
> say we, as a former member of the team), I think it's important to show |
| 15 |
> that claim to be false. |
| 16 |
Er ok, although that makes the above a bit less of a given ;) Wrt to |
| 17 |
detractors, I have a feeling that many of those will be people who would be |
| 18 |
affected by the work of the team, and their cohorts. In my opinion all mail |
| 19 |
to proctors should be publically accessible. After all, it is sent in clear |
| 20 |
text to an official complaints address. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 23 |
> Gentoo Proctors |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> General Applicability / Enforcement Questions (to be answered by council?) |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> What medium/channels? |
| 28 |
Any and all with gentoo in the name. (R) anyone? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> What powers? |
| 31 |
Equivalent to forum admin. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> What philosophy: punishments/preventive action? |
| 34 |
Ditto. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> What are the available options for the different mediums (we need the |
| 37 |
> input from infra) |
| 38 |
FFS you're programmers! |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
> Do we want/accept penalties/remedies crossing mediums? (Do we want a ban |
| 41 |
> from forums to extend to bugzilla?) |
| 42 |
Yes. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
> Do we want/accept permanent bans? |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
Yes. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
> What audience? |
| 49 |
> Do we address users and devs? (council said everyone) |
| 50 |
++ |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
> What powers can/will the proctors have over devs? |
| 53 |
What? As above. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
> Do proctors act on devs directly or through devrel? |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
Directly with input from kloeri and g2boojum |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
> What proctors? |
| 60 |
Er. |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
> Are proctors elected or appointed and by whom? |
| 63 |
Elected from pool: forum admins, devrel and council. |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
> Are members elected/appointed for a mandate or for ad-eternum? |
| 66 |
Mandate. wtf asked that? |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
> Who controls the proctors? (who watches the watchman?) |
| 69 |
Er we do. Got it? :) |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
<snip blah> |
| 72 |
Thanks for some sanity :) |
| 73 |
Flame on paludis minions! |
Archives