1 |
It should be rather obvious by now that I don't think we need the |
2 |
proctors. |
3 |
|
4 |
Nevertheless, some points made below need to be addressed. |
5 |
|
6 |
On Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:16:09 AM Ranjit Singh wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> > Do we want/accept penalties/remedies crossing mediums? (Do we want a |
9 |
> > ban from forums to extend to bugzilla?) |
10 |
> Yes. |
11 |
|
12 |
No. If the offender does behave on other mediums, why should he be banned |
13 |
from those? |
14 |
|
15 |
> > Do we want/accept permanent bans? |
16 |
> Yes. |
17 |
|
18 |
No! Everyone deserves another chance. |
19 |
|
20 |
> > What audience? |
21 |
> > Do we address users and devs? (council said everyone) |
22 |
> ++ |
23 |
|
24 |
For devs we have DevRel. |
25 |
|
26 |
> > What powers can/will the proctors have over devs? |
27 |
> What? As above. |
28 |
|
29 |
None. |
30 |
|
31 |
> > Do proctors act on devs directly or through devrel? |
32 |
> Directly with input from kloeri and g2boojum |
33 |
|
34 |
For obvious reasons (kloeri retired), there should be no personal |
35 |
involvement but groups only. |
36 |
|
37 |
> > Are proctors elected or appointed and by whom? |
38 |
> Elected from pool: forum admins, devrel and council. |
39 |
|
40 |
Elected. From the developer community. |
41 |
|
42 |
> > Who controls the proctors? (who watches the watchman?) |
43 |
> Er we do. Got it? :) |
44 |
|
45 |
The council and the developer community as they can vote for someone else |
46 |
for the next term. |
47 |
|
48 |
> Flame on paludis minions! |
49 |
|
50 |
Would you kindly leave this out of here? Thanks! |
51 |
|
52 |
Best regards, Wulf |