1 |
(CC-ing the remaining people to remind them to be subscribed to -project |
2 |
and read archives) |
3 |
|
4 |
W dniu wto, 26.06.2018 o godzinie 09∶11 +0200, użytkownik Michał Górny |
5 |
napisał: |
6 |
> To improve readability of the thread, I'll ask my question in reply to |
7 |
> myself ;-). |
8 |
|
9 |
Three more questions from me: |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
1. Do you believe that Council members should respect the requests of |
13 |
the developer community even if they disagree with them? Or should |
14 |
Council members decide based on their own judgment of arguments |
15 |
presented? |
16 |
|
17 |
Example: there's a heated debate, and the majority of respondents |
18 |
request that X is implemented. However, after reading all the arguments |
19 |
you don't think that X is a good idea but you haven't managed to |
20 |
convince others. Would you vote for X (as your electorate demands) |
21 |
or against it (as you believe is better for the distro)? |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
2. Do you believe that the Council should proactively research the state |
25 |
of affairs and make decisions whenever they believe the direction |
26 |
of the distribution needs to be adjusted? Or should it be passive |
27 |
and avoid involvement unless developers explicitly request Council's |
28 |
intervention? |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
3. Do you believe the developer community should hold the power |
32 |
to veto or dissolve the Council at any point? Provided there's a global |
33 |
developer vote agreeing on that. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Best regards, |
38 |
Michał Górny |