1 |
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 11:08 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
2 |
> On 24.02.2020 10:47, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 22:35 -0800, Alec Warner wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:39 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > > On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 22:11 +0000, Roy Bamford wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > This 'revision' group alread exists. Its called the Gentoo council. |
8 |
> > > > > Unless, that is, council have no oversight of comrel? |
9 |
> > > > No, that's not how things work. You don't have an appeal body |
10 |
> > > > proactively look into what all projects are doing. |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > I think by definition this is reactive. Comrel publishes a report[0], and |
13 |
> > > the Council[1] reviews it. |
14 |
> > I thought we've already established that the reports are meaningless. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > The way I see it, your system basically means that, repeatedly: |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > 1. ComRel does their job. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > 2. ComRel wastes their time publishing a meaningless report. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > 3. Since the report is meaningless, Council has to audit ComRel's work. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Since digging for past data is usually more effort than processing it |
25 |
> > as it flows, Council may as well start proactively auditing everything. |
26 |
> > Except that's not its purpose, and I don't see why we should throw |
27 |
> > random extra tasks on their plate just because. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > In my opinion, if we are to go for auditing ComRel, we should select |
30 |
> > a separate group of people for that, people that choose to put their |
31 |
> > effort into auditing rather than incidentally get dragged into it. |
32 |
> > Furthermore, I believe this group should not have any direct deciding |
33 |
> > power. Instead, they should bring any issues their find to ComRel's |
34 |
> > attention and/or appeal them to the Council. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> |
37 |
> This is meaningless also, because an individual who finds ComRel |
38 |
> decision unacceptable can appeal to Council directly, you do not need |
39 |
> third party layer here. |
40 |
|
41 |
The individual can only judge the reply to his own request. He lacks |
42 |
the wider context to audit the process and decisions (or lack of them) |
43 |
wrt multiple different requests. |
44 |
|
45 |
This works both ways. People are also making accusations and claim |
46 |
about ComRel based on what they guess might be happening. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Best regards, |
50 |
Michał Górny |