1 |
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2019, 02:56:29 CET schrieb Rich Freeman: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 7:55 PM Chris Reffett <creffett@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On 1/31/2019 7:42 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 2/1/19 1:41 AM, Chris Reffett wrote: |
5 |
> > >> but let me pose a more philosophical |
6 |
> > >> question: _why should proving my real name matter_? |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > It matters in the context of copyright law. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > That said, though, I'm talking about the GPG key itself here, not my |
11 |
> > commits, and I think that verification of real identity through WoT is |
12 |
> > an unreasonably high bar for claiming copyright. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> ++ |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I think there are a lot of good reasons to require real names. |
17 |
> However, making that our policy and upholding it when we have cause to |
18 |
> think a name is false doesn't require us to rigorously check IDs. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Maybe for officers listed on filings for the Foundation it is more of a |
21 |
> concern. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> IMO Gentoo developers should simply be asked to provide their real |
24 |
> name, and to confirm that they are legally adults. I don't think |
25 |
> we're doing anything that necessitates a higher level of due diligence |
26 |
> than that unless somebody actually brings a potential specific concern |
27 |
> to our attention. |
28 |
|
29 |
++ |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
33 |
dilfridge@g.o |
34 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
35 |
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |