1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA256
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 08:09:23 +0200
|
5 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 03:04 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
8 |
> > Michał Górny schrieb: |
9 |
> > > > > If you follow that logic, we end up with ComRel deciding to |
10 |
> > > > > punish people based on the private opinions of its members |
11 |
> > > > > rather than established rules. |
12 |
> > > > |
13 |
> > > > what logic? |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > The logic that ComRel apparently doesn't create rules. Ergo, |
16 |
> > > ComRel punishes without rules. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > I don't think so. ComRel does not create the rules. While they do |
19 |
> > have internally established procedures how to deal with things, the |
20 |
> > important rules by which they operate are imposed from outside. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> |
23 |
> It all depends on where you set the line between 'rules imposed from |
24 |
> outside' and 'rules (procedures) internally established'. QA doesn't |
25 |
> go out of their way to introduce abstract rules either, it mostly |
26 |
> builds more precise rules from generic directives 'imposed from |
27 |
> outside'. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
Right but you are missing the point here: comrel does not create "if X
|
32 |
then ban Y days" type of rules. comrel reacts to complaints: this is
|
33 |
what is imposed from outside. Obviously there is no algorithmic rule in
|
34 |
that kind of procedure.
|
35 |
QA, on the other hand, does create "this does not belong to gentoo.git"
|
36 |
types of rules that apply to anyone.
|
37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
38 |
|
39 |
iHUEAREIAB0WIQSpOxaxaZikKNVNlsYOJUi7xgflrgUCXMbFpwAKCRAOJUi7xgfl
|
40 |
rv7AAP4zMKkMzSLMaxsh3Ss7fyP3liBmvnqNZjprdMOy0NWbuQD/YxLCLIywlNls
|
41 |
E9BFQ9YjxmWZW98/w8rqz7IxZ31LNdA=
|
42 |
=64bw
|
43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |