Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Virgil Dupras <hsoft@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 20:15:05
Message-Id: 20180402161411.5b0ba2fefc8fe83a223cdf89@hardcoded.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof by Daniel Robbins
1 On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:49:25 -0600
2 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote:
3
4 > [obscene attacks]
5
6 Regardless of the merit of anything that was said in this way-larger-than-it-should topic(-cluster), you had already crossed the line once, vulgarity-wise, was warned, and came back with something even more vulgar.
7
8 None of your interlocutors even came close in terms of vulgarity. This is beyond childish retaliation, it's a gratuitous, vulgar attack and is objectively unacceptable.
9
10 I fully expect Comrel to take action. Subscribers of this list (gentoo users!) shouldn't have to waste time reading this. This is surreal.
11
12 Regards,
13 Virgil Dupras

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org>