| 1 |
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:44:15 +0100 |
| 2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 13-11-2012 09:06:19 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Fabian Groffen |
| 6 |
> > <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > On 12-11-2012 21:40:53 -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 8 |
> > >> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic |
| 9 |
> > >> related to udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the |
| 10 |
> > >> vote for another month so that we have time to get organized? |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > The Council has no votes scheduled for today's meeting. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Huh? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Do you see the word "vote" in there? (It isn't in there on purpose.) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
what's the difference between 'approve/disapprove' and 'vote' ? the |
| 21 |
difference is not clear to me. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> > 2. Handling separate /usr support[1] (15 minutes) |
| 25 |
> > - approve/disapprove plan (forcing everyone to take action, and |
| 26 |
> > implement one of the two "supported" solutions) |
| 27 |
> > - approve/disapprove removal of gen_usr_ldscript |
| 28 |
> > - define timeframe |
| 29 |
> > * 30 days |
| 30 |
> > * 6 months |
| 31 |
> > * 1 year |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > 3. Policy on "<" versioned dependencies[2] (5 minutes) |
| 34 |
> > - state whether said policy exists (homework for the council |
| 35 |
> > members) |
| 36 |
> |
Archives