| 1 |
On 2/4/19 12:06 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2019-02-04 10:09 a.m., Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:43:53 -0500 |
| 4 |
>> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:35 AM Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |
| 7 |
>>> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:13:36 +0100 |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Picking random message to reply to. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I guess we should figure out the level of support users can expect to |
| 14 |
receive from using this GURU repo. If someone forks a package I |
| 15 |
maintain and then a user has issues I'm not sure how much 'official' |
| 16 |
support they can expect. Certainly for complicated ebuilds, with |
| 17 |
'multiple right' ways of doing things, this could result in an |
| 18 |
'official' maintainer being at odds with the 'unoffical' one. Maybe we |
| 19 |
have that now? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I came to devship partly through Sunrise, also. The review process was |
| 22 |
so intense that I knew not to even submit something with an extra space. |
| 23 |
It was a great way to learn. At least for me. The review process was |
| 24 |
never as 'agressive' as it seems to be, now. It was supportive and |
| 25 |
helpful and the reviewing developers really wanted you to get better. |
Archives