1 |
On Monday 19 May 2008 16:39:02 Richard Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> Alistair Bush wrote: |
3 |
> > It really isn't the Councils decision and the only thing they can do to |
4 |
> > get themselves out of this situation is to hold an election. Firstly, |
5 |
> > even tho this is absolutely minor , GLEP 39 has been "breached" and it |
6 |
> > details what the solution is for that breach. Therefore that solution, |
7 |
> > a new council via an election, _must_ be performed. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Uh - the word "must" is a bit strong. Why "must" an election be |
10 |
> performed? GLEP 39 is a document several years old, that probably |
11 |
> pre-dates half of the devs here, and most likely most of the ones that |
12 |
> were around weren't really envisioning that it be used in this way today. |
13 |
Because that was the wording we voted on. |
14 |
|
15 |
I'd say hold the election as GLEP 39 specifies and be done with the issue. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen |
19 |
Gentoo Linux Security Team |
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |