| 1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I want the council to make clear whether useflags that are: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> * unsupported by the maintainer |
| 6 |
> * are known to break the build or application at runtime |
| 7 |
> * introduce security vulnerabilities |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> are allowed to remain unmasked in stable packages. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> - -- |
| 13 |
> reference bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482112 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
As far as I can see, this concerns a single package only. So please |
| 16 |
try to resolve through project lead and QA team, as outlined in |
| 17 |
GLEP 48. If you disagree with the QA team's resolution, _then_ you may |
| 18 |
appeal to the council. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Not adding to next meeting's agenda. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ulrich |
Archives