Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, gentoo dev announce <gentoo-dev-announce@l.g.o>
Cc: council@g.o
Subject: Re: Git workflow GLEP (Was: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items, council meeting 8/October/2017 18:00 UTC)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:36:28
Message-Id: 26b8b302-5d78-6baf-d66b-c05a9e79980f@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: Git workflow GLEP (Was: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items, council meeting 8/October/2017 18:00 UTC) by "Michał Górny"
1 On 09/30/2017 07:32 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
2 >>>> Which could also be seen as an argument for Gentoo-Bug: XXXXXX
3 >>>>
4 >>> And then Gentoo-Closes, Debian-Closes, Fancybuntu-Closes, My-Fun-
5 >>> Upstream-Tracker-Bug...
6 >> Not really, Closes is already used for multiple providers of
7 >> infrastructure such as Bitbucket and GitHub, so here URI is anyways
8 >> needed and isn't specific to Gentoo. Debian bug wouldn't be closed by us
9 >> to begin with, but it'd fit into a generic Reference: tag if we pulled a
10 >> patch from it or it discusses it somehow. Ditto for upstream, that goes
11 >> in Reference as well
12 >>
13 > How is this an argument for introducing a completely incompatible
14 > and inconsistent concept for the other of the pair?
15
16 Please elaborate
17
18 --
19 Kristian Fiskerstrand
20 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
21 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies