Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matthias Maier <tamiko@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: A plan for Gentoo
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:34:53
Message-Id: 87r2rzu4do.fsf@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: A plan for Gentoo by Daniel Robbins
1 Hi Daniel,
2
3 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017, at 13:01 CST, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote:
4
5 > Hi All,
6 >
7 > Just want to follow up for anyone following this thread.
8
9 Your help on Portage development is certainly appreciated. And I am
10 happy to hear that the bus factor of the portage project will go up a
11 bit (it is too close to 1 at the moment).
12
13 > For the sake of keeping gentoo-project on topic, consider this a simple
14 > status update of what drobbins is up to and how he's collaborating with
15 > Gentoo, so that there is no mystery. [...]
16
17 (Commenting on a number of previous e-mails from you:)
18
19 <developer and council hat>
20
21 I suggest we all try to keep history and politics a bit out of the
22 discussion. Meaning your contributions are very much appreciated. But I
23 think that currently is not the right time for discussing some special
24 council/developer status (or similar).
25
26 I think it will certainly help if we all (meaning the developer
27 community and you) get a bit acquainted to each other. Some targeted,
28 project related work and contributions from you are a perfect
29 opportunity for that. I suggest we spend a couple of months on that
30 first and touch bases again in spring next year about becoming a
31 (regular) developer again.
32
33 For future posts, what about we relocate development updates on Portage
34 to gentoo-dev? (We're working on whitelists for contributors.) I am
35 certainly interested in getting a bit of details about Portage
36 development - further, input from our PMS team and other package
37 managers might be a good idea.
38
39 Best,
40 Matthias

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: A plan for Gentoo Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o>