1 |
Hi Daniel, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017, at 13:01 CST, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Hi All, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Just want to follow up for anyone following this thread. |
8 |
|
9 |
Your help on Portage development is certainly appreciated. And I am |
10 |
happy to hear that the bus factor of the portage project will go up a |
11 |
bit (it is too close to 1 at the moment). |
12 |
|
13 |
> For the sake of keeping gentoo-project on topic, consider this a simple |
14 |
> status update of what drobbins is up to and how he's collaborating with |
15 |
> Gentoo, so that there is no mystery. [...] |
16 |
|
17 |
(Commenting on a number of previous e-mails from you:) |
18 |
|
19 |
<developer and council hat> |
20 |
|
21 |
I suggest we all try to keep history and politics a bit out of the |
22 |
discussion. Meaning your contributions are very much appreciated. But I |
23 |
think that currently is not the right time for discussing some special |
24 |
council/developer status (or similar). |
25 |
|
26 |
I think it will certainly help if we all (meaning the developer |
27 |
community and you) get a bit acquainted to each other. Some targeted, |
28 |
project related work and contributions from you are a perfect |
29 |
opportunity for that. I suggest we spend a couple of months on that |
30 |
first and touch bases again in spring next year about becoming a |
31 |
(regular) developer again. |
32 |
|
33 |
For future posts, what about we relocate development updates on Portage |
34 |
to gentoo-dev? (We're working on whitelists for contributors.) I am |
35 |
certainly interested in getting a bit of details about Portage |
36 |
development - further, input from our PMS team and other package |
37 |
managers might be a good idea. |
38 |
|
39 |
Best, |
40 |
Matthias |