| 1 |
On 01-08-2011 23:10:43 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> Ok, thanks. Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote |
| 3 |
> >> for transferring the cloak responsibility to devrel? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Yes I think this is pretty much the gist. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> No, I'm sorry but that's not the point. |
| 8 |
> First, these users issues need to be moved to "community relations", the |
| 9 |
> project I and Petteri have been talking about to unite DevRel and UserRel. |
| 10 |
> In any case, the 2 issues at stake here are: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 1. Do we want / support gentoo/user cloaks or not? If so, what is needed |
| 13 |
> for anyone to get them. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think the council in general should only decide on the first question. |
| 16 |
The second one should not be an open discussion, but instead |
| 17 |
pre-discussed such that the council can simply vote on the whole (yes |
| 18 |
support cloaks, and like this) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> 2. What should gentoo/contributor cloaks mean? Should they be reserved |
| 21 |
> to ATs/HTs/other official project members? How can they be requested / |
| 22 |
> validated? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
This seems totally out of the domain of council to me. We have |
| 25 |
specialised sub-projects to deal with these kinds of grey areas. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 30 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives