1 |
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:35:12 +0000 |
2 |
Craig Inches <craig@×××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hi, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I have decided to stop involvement with the Project as a proxied |
7 |
> maintainer, and to stop pursuing becoming a developer. Two main |
8 |
> reasons for this, one the community is at times openly hostile on the |
9 |
> mailing lists and IRC, of which I have asked people on IRC about whom |
10 |
> have responded this is the norm(once in awhile vents is fine it |
11 |
> happens but this has been consistently visible) this is ignoring |
12 |
> cultural differences that may cause misunderstanding; Secondly the |
13 |
> community is very insular and unwelcoming to new comers. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> In twelve months of working with people only 2 have actively |
16 |
> encouraged involvement (shout out to Idella4 and pacho for this), some |
17 |
> projects didn't respond, or if they did they provided no details or |
18 |
> feedback to those of us who where new and trying to contribute. |
19 |
|
20 |
I'm sorry you got this impression of us collectively. :). |
21 |
|
22 |
Its too difficult keeping a group of people motivated, tension free, |
23 |
and productive in opensource ( Though I do get the distinct impression, |
24 |
talking about the problem simply exacerbates the symptoms, so much energy |
25 |
wasted this week on talk of CoC that could have easily be spent on something |
26 |
useful :/ ) |
27 |
|
28 |
> don't want to mention names about the negatives because I don't blame |
29 |
> the individuals; it too me seems to be systemic within the community. |
30 |
> I have a few comments about how I think you could improve things, but |
31 |
> feel free to ignore they are offered in the spirit of constructive |
32 |
> criticism: |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Review your CoC, its open to abuse as pointed out on another thread. |
35 |
|
36 |
I'm not sure our CoC is being "abused" as such. Though I do dislike CoC's in |
37 |
general. |
38 |
|
39 |
> Enforcement of rules should be consistent. |
40 |
|
41 |
Acting as a moderator for any group of people is an entirely unenviable task, |
42 |
sadly. |
43 |
|
44 |
I agree consistency is key, and having clear guidelines for what is, and what |
45 |
isn't "in bounds" is really helpful, but it always tends to fall the way of |
46 |
good intentions, two people seldom see things the same way, and even groups |
47 |
of people are subject to invisible cognitive biases and motivated reasoning. |
48 |
|
49 |
On the one hand, clear and consistent rules give the "good users" a good |
50 |
framework for expectations and helps them behave in ways that make the |
51 |
community prosper, but rigid rules also end up with louts "rule-gaming", |
52 |
where they find ways of being obnoxiously annoying and making everything |
53 |
horrible for everyone despite it not being definitively "in the wrong" |
54 |
|
55 |
Hence, a degree of liberal interpretation is pretty much necessary. |
56 |
|
57 |
And pretty much anyone who acts as a moderator will find themselves hated |
58 |
by a few who find them too harsh, I see this far too often :/. |
59 |
|
60 |
But that's to be expected, the moderator is a custodian of the sort |
61 |
of tone and styles of conversation that we aught to have in the community. |
62 |
|
63 |
Certain people may fall outside this tone, and this is simply |
64 |
a regretful acknowledgement that this persons conversational approaches |
65 |
are unwanted in that community, and that perhaps, they could find |
66 |
a community more suited to their styles. Hopefully, people |
67 |
will be happier if they gravitate towards communities that suit them, |
68 |
instead of expecting communities to bend to suit them. |
69 |
|
70 |
> Review your recruitment strategies, and framework for contribution. |
71 |
|
72 |
I agree, recruitment is probably more difficult than it should be, |
73 |
but we're gradually making inroads, (Kicking and screaming?) |
74 |
|
75 |
> https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ might be of interest to some |
76 |
> posters! construct a well reason argument - but be prepared to |
77 |
> reconsider! |
78 |
> Finally encourage Active involvement from all Developers in Gentoo |
79 |
> matters not just in their packages, apathy is your worst enemy |
80 |
|
81 |
Agreed. Though I've gotten the overall impression from a lot of communities, |
82 |
that the regular need to be steeped in heavily emotional open-source office |
83 |
politics greatly fuels peoples apathy, the social disconnect and inability |
84 |
to reason with each other in mutually beneificial ways leads to field |
85 |
narrowing and self-isolation. |
86 |
|
87 |
~~ "Affhyj, the mailinglist drama, screw this, I'm just gonna put my |
88 |
head down and get stuff done instead and hope I don't make things worse" |
89 |
|
90 |
> I have updated one outstanding ticket for bugzilla from last week that |
91 |
> was assigned to me as maintainer wanted, and will shortly put through |
92 |
> a pull request on github which updates the meta data for bugzilla and |
93 |
> displaycal removing me as a maintainer. |
94 |
> |
95 |
> To end on a positive note, I was a user for many years and will |
96 |
> continue for the short term at the very least as I think the concept |
97 |
> of gentoo is great. |
98 |
|
99 |
Thanks for honest and neutral feedback :) |