Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:00:24
Message-Id: 54E0D0F2.104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract by Andrew Savchenko
1 On 02/15/15 10:05, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
2 > On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:50:27 +0100 Michał Górny wrote:
3 >> Dnia 2015-02-15, o godz. 15:39:58
4 >> Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> napisał(a):
5 >>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:55:41 +0100 Alexey Lapitsky wrote:
6 > [...]
7 >>> Is Gentoo willing to say "no" to the software freedom and its own
8 >>> social obligations in order to make contributions easier in the
9 >>> simplest way possible?
10 >> Please explain me, how *exactly* does allowing contributions via
11 >> proprietary platform hurt free software?
12 > If this platform will become a de-facto common way to made
13 > contributions (and this may happen taking into account github's
14 > popularity), then platform unavailability or policy changes may
15 > hurt the whole development process.
16
17 Github can change its terms of service at any time [1]. They do have to
18 notify us, but that's it. Beyond that anything goes provided it is
19 legal in US/California law. It can in principle begin making copyright
20 claims to new commits.
21
22 Ref.
23 [1] https://help.github.com/articles/github-terms-of-service/
24
25
26
27 --
28 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
29 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
30 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
31 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
32 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA