| 1 |
I've got an item for the agenda myself: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
mgorny started a thread about the future of dohtml on gentoo-dev [1]. |
| 4 |
Nobody has spoken up in favour of keeping the function. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
So, I am asking the council to discuss and vote on the following |
| 7 |
questions: |
| 8 |
- Should dohtml be banned from the package manager? |
| 9 |
- If yes, what would be the time frame? We could ban it in EAPI 6 |
| 10 |
already. Alternatively, we could deprecate it now and ban it in some |
| 11 |
later EAPI. |
| 12 |
- Do we need a substitute in an eclass? (Note that dohtml in Portage |
| 13 |
is written in Python, so it would have to be rewritten from |
| 14 |
scratch.) |
| 15 |
- If the answer to the first question is no: Should einstalldirs in |
| 16 |
EAPI 6 use dodoc -r for HTML_DOCS, instead of dohtml? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ulrich |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92677 |
Archives