Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:31:58
Message-Id: 5827C28A.9070607@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 13/11/16 01:30, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Sunday, November 13, 2016 2:22:53 AM EST Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
3 >> On 11/13/2016 02:21 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
4 >>> On Friday, November 11, 2016 7:22:19 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
5 >>>> That really reeks of micromanagement to me. We don't have Council
6 >>>> approve individual appointments in any team currently, and the Comrel
7 >>>> lead already has the power to add/remove anybody from the team as
8 >>>> needed.
9 >>> No other project in Gentoo is controlled like that. Any developer can join
10 >>> any team without approval. It is not right that Comrel get's to choose
11 >>> who gets to be part of Comrel. Also that Comrel can remove members from
12 >>> that team/project.
13 >> " The QA team lead must approve developers who would like to join the
14 >> project. The applicant must demonstrate a thorough understanding of the
15 >> duties he would like to perform. By accepting the applicant the QA team
16 >> lead will accept the responsibility to direct them as part of the team
17 >> and will be held responsible for any action the team member takes on
18 >> behalf of the QA team."
19 > That is so wrong... That should be changed immediately!!!
20 >
21 > No areas of Gentoo should be restricted like that. Anyone should be able to
22 > join any team. Others should work with them if they lack the skills to help
23 > them along, etc.
24 >
25 Ideal world vs harsh reality I fear ...

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature