1 |
Could you add references to the relevant council decisions for these? |
2 |
|
3 |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote: |
4 |
> We recently saw a proposal by ajak for updating GLEP 39, which would |
5 |
> require an all-developers vote. If we do that, we could use it to get |
6 |
> some other changes in. Some of them are pending since many years; |
7 |
> I have collected them from bugzilla, council meeting logs, and mailing |
8 |
> list postings. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> The patches in this series should be independent of each other (and of |
11 |
> ajak's patch), so each of them can be discussed separately. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Ulrich Müller (6): |
14 |
> glep-0039: Update title |
15 |
> glep-0039: Updating GLEP 39 requires an all-developers vote |
16 |
> glep-0039: Replace leaving council members by next in line |
17 |
> glep-0039: Council members must be developers |
18 |
> glep-0039: A meeting must dissolve if not quorate |
19 |
> glep-0039: Projects need not have a lead |
20 |
> |
21 |
> glep-0039.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- |
22 |
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) |
23 |
> |
24 |
> -- |
25 |
> 2.38.1 |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |