Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: John Helmert III <ajak@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH 0/6] Some updates for GLEP 39
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:37:16
Message-Id: Y4ZfaEnBf1QQo8PW@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] [PATCH 0/6] Some updates for GLEP 39 by "Ulrich Müller"
1 Could you add references to the relevant council decisions for these?
2
3 On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
4 > We recently saw a proposal by ajak for updating GLEP 39, which would
5 > require an all-developers vote. If we do that, we could use it to get
6 > some other changes in. Some of them are pending since many years;
7 > I have collected them from bugzilla, council meeting logs, and mailing
8 > list postings.
9 >
10 > The patches in this series should be independent of each other (and of
11 > ajak's patch), so each of them can be discussed separately.
12 >
13 > Ulrich Müller (6):
14 > glep-0039: Update title
15 > glep-0039: Updating GLEP 39 requires an all-developers vote
16 > glep-0039: Replace leaving council members by next in line
17 > glep-0039: Council members must be developers
18 > glep-0039: A meeting must dissolve if not quorate
19 > glep-0039: Projects need not have a lead
20 >
21 > glep-0039.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
22 > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
23 >
24 > --
25 > 2.38.1
26 >
27 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH 0/6] Some updates for GLEP 39 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>