Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: Alice Ferrazzi <alicef@g.o>, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, qa <qa@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:33:14
Message-Id: 2433496.kPKzriBPtE@porto
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions by Alice Ferrazzi
1 Am Samstag, 13. April 2019, 05:07:12 CEST schrieb Alice Ferrazzi:
2 >
3 > I think such problems have to be dealt by using continuous integration
4 > checks on commits, not by banning people around.
5
6 Automated checks are fine and useful, but only if they prevent committing crap
7 in the first place (git hook), not if they complain afterwards (ci check).
8
9 Add now how many people complain about the incredible hurdle of getting their
10 gpg key right once, or about having to add that horrible Signed-Off-By line,
11 and you get how popular commit hooks would be.
12
13
14 --
15 Andreas K. Hüttel
16 dilfridge@g.o
17 Gentoo Linux developer
18 (council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature