Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: pacho@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Tinderbox and building everything
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:32:20
Message-Id: 20140511013200.653b29b5@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Tinderbox and building everything by Pacho Ramos
1 On Sat, 10 May 2014 21:12:54 +0200
2 Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > At least from my point of view (as member or treecleaners), I would
5 > welcome the tinderbox as would help to detect more broken packages,
6 > some of them really old and that are not going to be fixed but, as
7 > nobody uses them, they are broken for a long time without noticing.
8
9 From the previous Tinderbox run there are a considerable amount of bugs
10 left behind that could be used; we can start there first, or instead
11 take bugs compared to commits in general and draw up a list from that.
12
13 Taking the top example from such list, recent bugs of sys-power/pm-utils
14 are longer being fixed for newly filed bugs after 2011; as evidenced
15 from the following URL if you scroll down to the unresolved ones.
16
17 https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL%20sys-power%2Fpm-utils
18
19 There are some more packages in the generated list below; as further as
20 you go, they become less and less candidate, but at the very least they
21 suggest which packages are still less maintained than we would like.
22
23 As to how to tell whether a package is broken and not fixable; bug
24 counts won't tell you, but manual investigation of its bugs does.
25
26 That's the case as long as we don't care about Priority / Severity;
27 talking about priorities, I think the list below is more important than
28 to remove unused packages which effort would have a low RoI value.
29
30 Tinderbox is something we should have sooner than later; but I don't
31 see why it needs to be a hype, added today or drop important work.
32
33 Not to forget about the amount of bug reports that get lost on IRC, the
34 Gentoo Forums or doesn't even reach us; eg. http://gentwoo.elisp.net/
35
36 Fetch statistics:
37 Open bugs: 19971
38
39 Processing statistics:
40 Open bugs without an ATOM (= no slash): 4205
41 Open bugs with an ATOM (= slash, matches paths too): 15766
42
43 Filter statistics:
44 Open bugs for a package outside the Portage tree
45 (or mismatch, new ebuild or path): 4182
46 Open bugs which have a package in the Portage tree: 11584
47
48 Packages with most open bugs for the least amount of last year commits:
49 5.000000 sys-power/pm-utils (Bugs: 15; Commits: 3)
50 4.000000 net-analyzer/nagios-plugins (Bugs: 12; Commits: 3; Proxied)
51 3.000000 sys-process/audit (Bugs: 9; Commits: 3)
52 3.000000 media-tv/linuxtv-dvb-firmware (Bugs: 12; Commits: 4; Herd)
53 2.875000 app-portage/g-cpan (Bugs: 23; Commits: 8)
54 2.833333 net-p2p/rtorrent (Bugs: 17; Commits: 6; Herd)
55 2.666666 net-analyzer/nagios (Bugs: 8; Commits: 3; Proxied)
56 2.333333 net-wireless/wimax (Bugs: 7; Commits: 3; Unmaintained)
57 2.333333 dev-perl/PortageXS (Bugs: 7; Commits: 3; Proxied)
58 2.333333 dev-lang/rubinius (Bugs: 7; Commits: 3; Herd)
59 2.333333 dev-db/firebird (Bugs: 14; Commits: 6; Proxied)
60 2.333333 app-admin/sysklogd (Bugs: 7; Commits: 3; Herd)
61 2.000000 sci-mathematics/flint (Bugs: 6; Commits: 3)
62 ... ...
63
64 --
65 With kind regards,
66
67 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
68 Gentoo Developer
69
70 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
71 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
72 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature