| 1 |
Dear everyone,
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
During yesterday's Council meetings we talked, among other things of
|
| 4 |
course, about making the review of activity on all the supported arches
|
| 5 |
(i.e. primarily the turnaround time for keyword/stabilisation requests)
|
| 6 |
a regular item on the agenda of Council meetings [1]. The current plan
|
| 7 |
is to have this discussed at least once every 6 months. The question is,
|
| 8 |
when exactly.
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Personally, I am leaning towards June+December. NeddySeagoon pointed out
|
| 11 |
yesterday that the June meeting is the last one in a Council term,
|
| 12 |
however I don't think that would be a problem - barring some
|
| 13 |
catastrophic failure in the operation of an arch team it is IMHO
|
| 14 |
extremely unlikely the council itself would have to take major actions
|
| 15 |
following such reviews, and if such a catastrophic failure ever occurs
|
| 16 |
keywording delays might be the least of our problems.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Conversely, I would very much advise AGAINST the following:
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- just say "every 6 months at most" and be done with it - let's save
|
| 21 |
ourselves the trouble of having to keep track of when the last time the
|
| 22 |
review took place was, shall we?
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
- July+January - the first meeting in a Council term AND immediately
|
| 25 |
after the Christmas / New Year holiday period
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- August+February - holiday season in both summer and winter
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Opinions? Suggestions?
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
[1]
|
| 35 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/sites/projects/council.git/tree/meeting-logs/20220109.txt
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
--
|
| 38 |
Marecki |
Archives