| 1 |
On 2021-01-11 05:57, desultory wrote: |
| 2 |
> So, just to be clear, you are pushing a suggestion which received much |
| 3 |
> more negative feedback than positive and which you avoid following |
| 4 |
> whenever possible? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
General information: Even if a proposed motion has received more |
| 7 |
negative than positive feedback, you are still allowed to ask council to |
| 8 |
vote on your specific motion like others are free to ask council to vote |
| 9 |
on alternative motions instead. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
As someone who was also part of the discussion: I for example got |
| 12 |
triggered by the rational paragraph. I was concerned about the idea to |
| 13 |
enforce a specific type of communication like excluding people because |
| 14 |
someone believes this is an unnecessarily long email (*who* decides |
| 15 |
something like that; what are the criteria...). This is not part of the |
| 16 |
change we voted for. From my understanding we only voted on adding a new |
| 17 |
paragraph which doesn't add anything new but clarifies stuff. I |
| 18 |
therefore had no problems to vote for this change. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 24 |
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |
Archives