| 1 |
On 07/12/2017 03:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Dear all, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> The new Gentoo Council will meet on Sunday, July 16th at 19:00 UTC |
| 6 |
>> in #gentoo-council on FreeNode. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Please reply to this message with any items you would like us to discuss |
| 9 |
>> or vote on. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Based on the on-going discussion about stabilization policies, I would |
| 12 |
> like to ask the council to consider moving glep 40 to withdrawn status. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
My understanding of GLEP workflow is that we can only do a replacement |
| 15 |
GLEP in this case, which was briefly discussed and mentioned as a likely |
| 16 |
outcome from wg-stable if agreeing on the policies. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Given the short time for the meeting I don't see us having the |
| 19 |
possibility to come up with a well thought-out proposal for a vote in |
| 20 |
time for it, but we have ample time for the meeting itself, so I'm |
| 21 |
adding a discussion item to the agenda: |
| 22 |
""" |
| 23 |
3.Discussion about the current situation of the stable tree |
| 24 |
=============================== |
| 25 |
Discussion about the current status of the stable tree, and whether it |
| 26 |
makes sense to replace GLEP 40 with something reflecting current state |
| 27 |
and expectation of Gentoo Developers and users. One possibility here is |
| 28 |
re-igniting the efforts of wg-stable with additional members now that |
| 29 |
there seems to be further interest in the discussions. |
| 30 |
""" |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I'll send out the final agenda later today. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 36 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 37 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives