1 |
On Wed, Sep 18, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
2 |
> Using a different approach to gain more developers might have more impact |
3 |
> than you imagine on the quality of the distribution as well as the progress |
4 |
> it makes. If the distribution would be 12 developers, it wouldn't be all |
5 |
> that hard to make a good roadmap and focus areas. Twelve people can easily |
6 |
> decide amongst each other what to do. But 200+ developers is a different |
7 |
> ballgame (hence the need for "bureaucratic" things like the Gentoo Council) |
8 |
> where decisions need to be weighted and where every individual can |
9 |
> contribute (or block) to the progress of the distribution. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Imagine what would happen if we had 500+ developers. |
12 |
|
13 |
Thanks you for a wonderfully succinct explanation of the damage that would |
14 |
be done if Gentoo developer status were awarded to people who did not |
15 |
nderstand how to develop the end-product, eg: out of deference to technical |
16 |
knowledge in other domains. |
17 |
|
18 |
Can I ask that you paste the whole text of your response into the Gentoo |
19 |
docs site somewhere? This comes up so often, on the forums and on IRC, it |
20 |
would help to have it where people will see it. Personally I'd paste it at |
21 |
the top of the devmanual front-page, so giving someone the link to that also |
22 |
ensures they are looking at it. Your call, ofc. |
23 |
|
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
steveL. |
26 |
-- |
27 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |