| 1 |
On 2/12/16 5:22 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Therefore, I would like to ask for Council's help on this issue. I see |
| 5 |
> the possible following actions that would help the cause: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> a. officially refusing the 'dynamic slot' request [2] so that it would |
| 8 |
> not be used to block fixing the QA violations indefinitely, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> b. setting an official deadline on fixing the remaining violations |
| 11 |
> and making the calls fatal. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566518 |
| 14 |
> [2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174407 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I was aware of, but haven't really thought through, toolchain.eclass use |
| 18 |
of use* in global scope. Do you have a solution? I'm okay with putting |
| 19 |
pressure on developers but if its a technically difficult problem, I'd |
| 20 |
rather be part of the solution than the problem. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 25 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 26 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 27 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives