1 |
On 04/10/2017 04:05 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 |
> $SUBJECT says it all... what do you think? |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Being of a mathematical mind, I'd suggest a graylisting approach with |
5 |
> |
6 |
> * exponential increase of delay times, tracked per sender |
7 |
> * a time-controlled decrease of the counters |
8 |
> -- balanced such that on average sending <= 3 mails per day incurs no |
9 |
> perceptible delay. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I have no clue if such a software already exists. It would be fun though. :) |
12 |
> |
13 |
That will only get in the way of people posting. If you're okay with |
14 |
severely cutting down both the signal *and* the noise, go for it. |
15 |
|
16 |
Personally I think it's a waste of time. Anyone who's that much of a |
17 |
problem will simply use other e-mail addresses. It only serves to curb |
18 |
the participation of people who stick with one e-mail address, which is |
19 |
most users and devs. |
20 |
|
21 |
What sort of problem are you trying to solve? |
22 |
-- |
23 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
24 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
25 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |