1 |
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 02:11:13PM -0500, R0b0t1 wrote: |
2 |
> Hello friends! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Christopher Díaz Riveros |
5 |
> <chrisadr@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > Daniel, |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > El lun, 02-04-2018 a las 09:23 -0600, Daniel Robbins escribió: |
9 |
> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Christopher Díaz Riveros |
10 |
> >> <chrisadr@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
> >> > _You_ can say that this is your Burden of proof that mgorny is not |
12 |
> >> > capable of being a Council member, but in the same line, _your |
13 |
> >> > post_ |
14 |
> >> > shows that you are neither in position to be a good Council member |
15 |
> >> > or |
16 |
> >> > project lead, at least that's just _my_ opinion about this post. |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> >> I am perfectly happy with you having that opinion, because I have |
19 |
> >> never had any intention of being a Council member or project lead, |
20 |
> >> nor "returning BDFL" of Gentoo that mgorny insinuates. |
21 |
> >> |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > No Daniel, but the fact is that you have history with Gentoo, even when |
24 |
> > you don't see yourself trying to be a "leader", you need to act like |
25 |
> > one. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > This reminds me some horrible local news from my country, where a |
28 |
> > congressman had to made public some videos about corruption that we |
29 |
> > suffer as country, that ended up in the resignation of our president. |
30 |
> > Maybe he had to leave, but making pressure by using private videos and |
31 |
> > then release them to public, was definetly not he correct way to do |
32 |
> > that. |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > This is the fact from you fact-list: |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > You showed the whole mailing list (and leaved a permanent tracking |
37 |
> > file) a conversation that was not previously seen by ComRel (which is |
38 |
> > the project who you should try to contact before making this kind of |
39 |
> > information public). Even when you are "just another user" here... I |
40 |
> > mean, you run Funtoo, you are a public leader, and how could I possibly |
41 |
> > trust my leader if he shows private conversations publicly... that's a |
42 |
> > fact no matter with whom the conversation is, or what is it about. |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> |
45 |
> While in general I have no business posting here, I think I should |
46 |
> rephrase what it seems you are saying: |
47 |
> |
48 |
> "People should not be held accountable for their actions, because that |
49 |
> might make them feel bad." |
50 |
> |
51 |
> I would be hard pressed to find people who agree. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Using the (US) legal system as a guide, if I break the law to obtain |
55 |
> evidence of someone *else* breaking the law, that evidence is |
56 |
> admissible (if I remember correctly) because I am not the government. |
57 |
> However, it is likely I would still be prosecuted for whatever law |
58 |
> that I broke, though in some areas any charges might be waived by |
59 |
> statute. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> In a semi-related vein, the majority of US states do not require that |
62 |
> all parties agree to have their correspondence recorded for any of the |
63 |
> participants to record that correspondence. |
64 |
> |
65 |
> |
66 |
> It stands to reason that if someone sees you behaving in a manner they |
67 |
> think others should be made aware of, society already supports making |
68 |
> others aware of those actions, even if custom would be to keep them |
69 |
> private. |
70 |
> |
71 |
> Cheers, |
72 |
> R0b0t1 |
73 |
> |
74 |
|
75 |
Some states such as Washington are known as "two-party", meaning that |
76 |
both parties to communications must consent to recording. This is often |
77 |
abused by corporations in this state by forcing customers to agree to |
78 |
*being* recorded, but refusing to help customers if they don't turn off |
79 |
their recording apparatus. I am unsure of the legal precedent, but |
80 |
practiced law is often different from written law. |
81 |
|
82 |
Legal Source: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9.73.030 |
83 |
|
84 |
As for corporate behavior, I worked for a company who did that for phone |
85 |
support and operated in Washington state. |
86 |
|
87 |
In short, it really depends on which state you're in. |
88 |
|
89 |
~zlg |