Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] The meaning of RESOLVED/UPSTREAM on bugzie
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:41:32
Message-Id: 20170331084049.61f59ab5@katipo2.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] The meaning of RESOLVED/UPSTREAM on bugzie by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:50:59 -0400
2 "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > It may even be possible to force this pragmatically. Require a comment with
5 > any status/keyword change via code. Form submit validation requirement. That
6 > way no one can get around it. It also does not require further enforcement,
7 > social or otherwise :)
8
9 Or, as a hybrid between that suggestion and my other "packaged response", perhaps
10 pre-fill the comment section with a templated response for various resolution types.
11
12 That way it discourages using the wrong resolution, by way of forcing you to either
13 say the template, or delete the templated answer and provide your own.
14
15 Eh, but I see potential implementation fun there.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] The meaning of RESOLVED/UPSTREAM on bugzie Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>