1 |
>> To get this mis-concept out again I need your help. |
2 |
>> There is no such thing as slacking in Gentoo - no matter how many weeks |
3 |
>> you ran without commits. It's time to get this understanding back to |
4 |
>> its healthy counterpart. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm not sure what problem you are trying to tackle. |
9 |
|
10 |
The way I see it, there are a few types of "slacker" status. |
11 |
|
12 |
There are those who are just plain busy, and can't respond in a timely |
13 |
manner due to real-life issues. Then there are a group who just don't |
14 |
have time for Gentoo as a regular maintenance task anymore, but still |
15 |
participate in discussions, development, etc. Then there's the last |
16 |
group who are completely unresponsive and inactive -- these are the ones |
17 |
that are real blockers. |
18 |
|
19 |
I don't like the idea of pretending there's no such thing as slacking, |
20 |
because there is. |
21 |
|
22 |
We do have a practical problem (though I don't know how serious it is). |
23 |
We have healthy roll calls in some herds, but the developers are in a |
24 |
certain range of active to unresponsive. When the herd is filled up, |
25 |
this gives developers and users the impression that it *should* be well |
26 |
tendered, but that may not be the case. |
27 |
|
28 |
Steve |