| 1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 09 Feb 2022, Sam James wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:37:17 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>> As I had announced in the January meeting, I'd ask the Council to |
| 7 |
>> pre-approve the list of features for EAPI 9, as listed here: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Please post a statement of intent / RFC to the gentoo-dev ML to |
| 10 |
> solicit feedback and give others time to make proposals too. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
There is no special time period for making such proposals; future EAPI |
| 13 |
bugs can be filed at any time. Preferably, they should be filed early, |
| 14 |
because we've had very bad experience with including last-minute |
| 15 |
features. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> If I've missed such an email, my apologies (as I'm currently on |
| 18 |
> another machine than usual for mail), but I didn't see one when I |
| 19 |
> looked. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> I do applaud this moving-a-bit-quicker / agile approach, but |
| 22 |
> it's important we give a chance for people to raise features |
| 23 |
> they've been looking to land, and so on. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
That is not how it works. The workflow is documented here: |
| 26 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Package_Manager_Specification/Future_EAPI_process |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Ulrich |
Archives