Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2017-09-10
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 19:16:06
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mRPUgmr4k3bBEPaW5dtCR2g8PwS+aa1GdsVKY8_KjVTQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2017-09-10 by "Michał Górny"
1 On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > W dniu pon, 04.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶55 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
3 > napisał:
4 >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
5 >> > W dniu pon, 04.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶19 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
6 >> > napisał:
7 >> >
8 >> > > If marking the profile as dev causes some breakage for users, then
9 >> > > those users should seriously consider contributing to the arch team,
10 >> > > because they're probably the only people around who might potentially
11 >> > > do so. If not, they get to keep the pieces.
12 >> >
13 >> > ...or dumping Gentoo for a distribution that doesn't dump huge breakage
14 >> > on users in week's time. Guess which one is more likely to happen.
15 >> >
16 >>
17 >> We can of course send out a news item in advance and warn of possible
18 >> issues if they stick with stable keywords. That is no effectively
19 >> different than just removing the stable keywords - either breaks if
20 >> the user takes no action.
21 >
22 > No. Dumping stable in favor of ~arch is one thing, that can be easily
23 > fixed on user's side by using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~hppa". Or a profile
24 > change for users who do not override ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
25 >
26 > Dumping profile stability altogether means that even ~arch won't work
27 > correctly anymore.
28 >
29
30 What do we think the odds are that we won't find ourselves in the same
31 place with ~arch in a few months? Just something to think about...
32
33 --
34 Rich