1 |
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> W dniu pon, 04.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶55 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman |
3 |
> napisał: |
4 |
>> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> > W dniu pon, 04.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶19 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman |
6 |
>> > napisał: |
7 |
>> > |
8 |
>> > > If marking the profile as dev causes some breakage for users, then |
9 |
>> > > those users should seriously consider contributing to the arch team, |
10 |
>> > > because they're probably the only people around who might potentially |
11 |
>> > > do so. If not, they get to keep the pieces. |
12 |
>> > |
13 |
>> > ...or dumping Gentoo for a distribution that doesn't dump huge breakage |
14 |
>> > on users in week's time. Guess which one is more likely to happen. |
15 |
>> > |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> We can of course send out a news item in advance and warn of possible |
18 |
>> issues if they stick with stable keywords. That is no effectively |
19 |
>> different than just removing the stable keywords - either breaks if |
20 |
>> the user takes no action. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> No. Dumping stable in favor of ~arch is one thing, that can be easily |
23 |
> fixed on user's side by using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~hppa". Or a profile |
24 |
> change for users who do not override ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Dumping profile stability altogether means that even ~arch won't work |
27 |
> correctly anymore. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
What do we think the odds are that we won't find ourselves in the same |
31 |
place with ~arch in a few months? Just something to think about... |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Rich |