| 1 |
>> I don't get all the fuss about this, though. So the Foundation is in |
| 2 |
>> trouble, so what? It's basically holding the Gentoo trademark in the |
| 3 |
>> USA (in Europe, it does *not*, another legal entity does here) and it |
| 4 |
>> is the copyright holder of the ebuilds. |
| 5 |
> Maybe it is all about the "so what?" mentality of the core that led to |
| 6 |
> this mess in the first place? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Please explain why I should care about the Gentoo Foundation in your opinion. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> I can understand that this angers the community and drobbins, as it |
| 11 |
> angers me too. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't. I *do* care about our users, about my ebuilds and the |
| 14 |
technical side of things. I do *not* care about a foundation that's |
| 15 |
supposed to be an IP container. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> But I think that some drastic actions must be taken, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Why? To appease the mob? What horrible, catastrophic thing has |
| 20 |
happened? Please explain that. I honestly don't see it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> maybe exactly because the bandwagon with the angry mob on it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Drastic measures because some people loudly claim the end of the world |
| 25 |
is coming? No, thank you. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
>> The ebuilds keep coming, we're basically doing "business" as usual and |
| 28 |
>> that should be enough, I'd say. |
| 29 |
> Sure, all is fine in the land of Gentoo - problems are for people that |
| 30 |
> have nothing better to do :( |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Name those problem, please. I'll gladly try to address them if I can. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Best regards, Wulf |
Archives